Skip to content

Raue Law firm

Rechtsanwälte und Notare

  • News
  • Expertise
  • Team
  • Career
  • About Raue
    • EN
    • DE

Berlin-Brandenburg Higher Administrative Court declares airport charges lawful: Raue rejects the lawsuits

In its ruling of 28 February 2024, the Higher Administrative Court of Berlin-Brandenburg dismissed the claims of four airlines that had challenged the BER airport charges.

Airlines pay the airport a take-off and landing fee for the use of the airport infrastructure. This takes into account the noise level of the aircraft – the aim is to incentivise the use of the quietest aircraft possible to minimise noise pollution for local residents.

Normally, this fee is increased in a standardised way depending on the type of aircraft. However, for the first time, Berlin Brandenburg Airport has opted for a new procedure with the fee schedule valid from 1 September 2022 to 31 December 2023: The noise emissions of each take-off and landing are now specifically recorded at a number of measuring points and thus form the basis for an individually calculated charge. This method of calculating charges provides strong incentives not only for further noise-reducing measures on the aircraft (engines, winglets, etc.), but also for noise-avoiding flight behavior (steep take-off/approach, thrust reduction/less engine power in gliding flight), as users benefit directly from the actual noise reduction in populated areas.

Four airlines initially defended themselves in summary proceedings before the Higher Administrative Court against the approval of the fee regulations issued by the Ministry of Infrastructure and Regional Planning of the State of Brandenburg. Raue, representing the Ministry, won a point against the application for interim legal protection, which the Higher Administrative Court rejected in its decision of 8 December 2022.

In the main proceedings, which have now been decided in final judgements, the Senate also followed Raue’s argumentation. Two of the actions had already been declared inadmissible because the airlines had not flown at BER during the period covered by the fee regulations in question. The Supreme Administrative Court dismissed the other two actions as unfounded. The airport operator had only limited room for manoeuvre in setting the noise charges, which could only be reviewed by the courts, and had complied with the statutory standards. The noise charges, which are levied on a case-by-case basis according to objective and transparent criteria, are therefore suitable to provide an incentive for quieter flying. Find here the full text of the court’s press release (in German).

(1 March 2024)

Print Version

Share article on

  • LinkedIn
  • Xing
  • Twitter

Contact

Kontaktbild Rechtsanwalt Kornelius Kleinlein

Dr. Kornelius Kleinlein

more
  • [email protected]
  • Tel +49 30 818 550 302
less
Kontaktbild Rechtsanwalt Daniel Schubert

Dr. Daniel Schubert

more
  • [email protected]
  • Tel +49 30 818 550 302
less

Contact

Potsdamer Platz 1 10785 Berlin Tel +49 30 818 550 0

Connect

  • Xing
  • LinkedIn
  • Law firm in Berlin
  • Privacy Policy
  • Imprint
We use technically necessary cookies. If you click on “OK”, we will also use tracking cookies for web analytics with Google Analytics. More Information OK
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT